Month: February 2019

We need to talk together!

two people sitting in a room not talk together

Why talk together?

We need to talk together because the world is changing! The days of the local church where everyone came from the same background, had similar religious experiences and shared the same cultural views and practices are numbered. Sure they will hang around for a while but they are dying out.

In a very simple, clear and accurate article Wesley Granberg-Michaelson writes about the future of the church. He makes the compelling case that the game is up for would be homogenous cuhrches. Try as they might most of these types of churches cannot grow. This is because demography, culture and changing world views have left them behind. In the US it is expected that 100 of these aging white Protestant mainline churches will close each year for the forseeable future. It has been happening iun Australia and Europe for decades.

Lectures and directives from the pulpit might work when the majority accept the dominant world view. However when groups are diverse and hold different perspectives and experiences they will not be told. Talk together is the key to sustaining diverse communities.

The changing landscape for the church

Granberg-Michaelson says that the changes that make this death spiral inevitable include:

  • Multiracial congregations are expanding to draw 1 in 5 churchgoing Americans. Surveys on American congregations report a higher level of spiritual vitality among them compared with racially homogeneous congregations.
  • For 400 years, the faith has been moulded by the largely European culture that came out of the Enlightenment. But today church vitality is coming from emerging expressions of Christianity in Africa as well as in Asia and Latin America.
  • These new influences are raising new questions about the relationship of the individual to the community, rational versus non-rational pathways to perceiving truth and the interplay of the spiritual and material realms.
  • As the yearning for authentic spiritual experience moves from the head to the heart in this new environment, spirit-filled communities are flourishing.
  • The culture wars in the church are divisions that are not seen as the core of the gospel and many contemprorary people don’t want to fight over them.
  • “Belonging before believing” is reshaping pathways of discipleship. The demand that outsiders first adhere to specific beliefs expressed in creeds or confessions is giving way to inviting them first to explore and share in worship, reflection and service.

Evangelism needs us to talk together

Anyone who has a genuine concern and capacity for evangelism knows how inportant it is to understand context. To understand context  – the life, experience and values of people – requires listening. Talking together starts by the dominant group listening to the ones who are different.

When it is appropriate there will be a place for the evangelical person, or church, to share their perspective. However it can never again be in the arrogant, superior, assumption of knowing what others need to learn. The talking will be more in the form of testimony about what God has meant in their life. Then, once again, it is time to listen to how others have experienced God in their life.

To talk together today about faith (or anything in the church) requires patience and humility. It requires a setting and practices that make it possible for all to share. Many of the processes in the Western church assume that there is one place of knowledge and one way to work it out. We need processes for being in community that are open to learning from the stories and experiences of others. There needs to be space to experience the non-rational ways of gaining insight.

How does your congregation foster open, honest and risk taking conversations? When you meet for Bible study how do you listen to one another? When you meet to make decisions how to you talk together so that all perspectives are heard? Unless churches develop process that help them to talk together they will not navigagte the changing landscape of society and the church.

“Farsighted – How to Make Decisions that Matter the Most”

Farsighted: How to Make Decisions that Matter the Most is written Steven Johnson (Riverhead, 2018). It is a must-read for church leaders who want to help their congregations make better decisions that address our usual cognitive biases and faulty intuitions.

In August, 2010 American Intelligence experts learned that an Osama bin Laden courier entered a fortified compound in the remote Pakistani city of Abbottabad.  They launched an extensive planning process that resulted on the successful May 2011 raid by US Special Forces.  What did they learn?

Johnson reminds us that thesuccess of the mission was not just due to  the soldiers who risked their lives to complete it. It also depended on the planners who had learned from previous mistakes. The key for the planners was to run a 2 phase decision-making process.

Johnson explains in Farsighted that planners first widened their thinking. They did this by defining the situation well and surfacing information. Only then did they begin considering numerous options.  This full appraisal worked because it led to them considering various alternatives. This was because they could play out different scenarios so the mission could be successful. They prepared well for any unforeseen reality.

Years of research and personal experience, have concluded that the human mind has biases. These biases lead us to misunderstand the past, misconstrue the present, and badly foresee the present. Nevertheless, there is hope.

Johnson shares practical tools that can improve our ability to make wise decisions – helping you to be farsighted.  He provides several examples of real life decisions and the deliberations that went into making them. We can learn creative steps to do the same.  This is how we become farsighted. Whatever choices your congregation faces these steps can ensure your success.

When we are faced with complex choices, we tend to frame problems too narrowly.  This results in eliminating creative solutions.  To combat this situation, Johnson outlines a process that draws from a diverse, wider group to generate options.  Most notably, he argues for including people from the ‘fringe’ of your organization and those impacted by the choices. He urges us to let them participate and offer suggestions.  Most groups usually only include their leadership base which results in fewer options that others can support.

Moreover, Johnson reminds us that a diversity of viewpoints is not enough to deal with the problems we face.  We must accumulate more than shared knowledge to consider all the viewpoints.  Most organizations, for example, never consider more than a single option or way forward.  This often leads to a gravitational pull toward how we usually frame a problem. As a result people often miss the nuances and creative discoveries that can result from scenario planning.  The “if this, then that” mentality can help us to deal with situations beyond our control and anticipate how to deal with them wisely.  Scenario planning allows you to play out how various versions of the future  may develop and to handle them well.

Did you know that most groups tend to make a decision only to be blocked later in implementing it when new factors come to light?  When you engage in scenario planning, it allows you to prepare for whatever happens next.  To be sure, this form of analysis can be overdone and paralyze a group from making any decision at all.  Yet this form of planning also allows you to make decisions that can creatively handle any situation well.

Johnson also shares tools like ‘linear value modeling.’ This helps us to make decisions that are congruent with who we are as an organization.  Looking at possible ‘bad outcomes’ helps us decide well.  Also, the skill of ‘generating all the information’ necessary to make a decision allows you to be resilient and to maturely face the consequences of your decisions.  Ultimately, surfacing information and generating options prepares people to trust their intuition and resolve issues well.

Speaking from the heart, the author concludes that we can draw from our shared stories and experience. The result is that we are not doomed to repeat previous mistakes. This proactive approach can create an unlimited sense of opportunity to face the future instead of short-changing our decision making by only doing what worked in the past.

There is also a summary and analysis of the book available here.